Marijuana Smoking Not Linked To Cancer or Lung Damage, Researchers Say

Categories: Health, Marijuana

Donald Tashkin, MD
Donald Tashkin's is a tale cannabis pushers like to repeat. The physician and professor at UCLA's David Geffen School of Medicine set out to prove -- via a study funded by the National Institutes on Drug Abuse -- that marijuana is bad for you. Instead, a long-term study found no solid link between marijuana use and lung cancer, in sharp contrast to tobacco terrible effects on health.

Similar findings were repeated all over the world. In a collection and review of studies on marijuana's effect on the lungs, published in the June issue of the Annals of the American Thoracic Society, Tashkin concludes that compared to tobacco smoking, heavy marijuana use has "relatively small and far lower" risks.

This despite an average joint marijuana having four times the tar of a typical American Spirit. How can this be?

It's worth remembering that this is not a new development -- Tashkin's long-term study was published in 2006. And well before that -- as in the 19th Century, when cannabis tinctures and other marijuana medicines were sold in pharmacies -- doctors were prescribing marijuana as a treatment for asthma patients.

There's more similarities between tobacco and marijuana that most cannabis advocates would like to admit. There are similar levels of ammonia and other carcinogens, and marijuana smokers inhale about four times the tar, Tashkin notes.

Yet several long-term studies found no positive association between marijuana use and lung cancer. And others -- judging lung function and health by lung capacity, function, and things like levels of sputum and phlegm -- found no positive link between marijuana use, even heavy, long-term use, and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease.

Marijuana use does have deleterious effects, but they are short-term. Other than bronchitis that goes away after the pipe is put away, it appears there's not much else long term harm done to the lungs by marijuana.

The key appears to be in the THC. Marijuana's main psychoactive ingredient has also shrank tumor cells in lab rats. It's possible that the THC encourages lung tissue to die before it can become cancerous, Tashkin suggests.

One of marijuana's most confounding effects is bronchodilation, or expansion of the lungs when exposed to marijuana smoke. Cigarette smoke, by contrast, leads to bronchoconstriction, or narrowing of air passages.

So that's what the 19th-century pot docs were after. And perhaps there will be some modern-day folks who catch on to this. A frequent critique of medical marijuana's existence is that nothing that is smoked can be medicine. Perhaps not -- but cannabis certainly cannot kill you, now or later.

My Voice Nation Help

some people just like to sssmoke!


some people just like to smoke!


Smoking simply is not required in order to gain the benefits of cannabis, whether for medicinal need or just plain enjoyment. I always recommend that people seriously consider not smoking it.  I quit in 2006 and have never looked back. There are just too many other delivery methods which don't require the person enjoying cannabis or utilizing it for its medicinal utility to inhale carbon monoxide.

The vaporizer is proven safe, less expensive, and preferred by the study's subjects by a margin of 7:1 in peer reviewed research published in 2007. No carbon monoxide or other nasty byproducts of smoking are produced when the vaporizer is set at the optimal temperature.

One other benefit of the vaporizer is personal safety. Do you realize how many people get arrested every year because an LEO smelled the odor of burning cannabis? Things would have been different for those people if they had stuck with a vaporizer, oromucosal delivery via tincture or gel strip, infused edibles/liquids, eye drops or suppositories.

Now Trending

Around The Web

From the Vault


©2014 SF Weekly, LP, All rights reserved.