Jerry Brown's Office Mad at Fox News Over "Fiction" Budget Story

Categories: Media, Politics

foxcomment2.png
via Romenesko
foxcomments.png
via Romesko
fox comment4.png
via Romesko



My Voice Nation Help
5 comments
Starchild
Starchild

Perhaps in referring to California having a $28 billion deficit, Fox News was talking about the state government's unfunded pension liabilities. Technically this should be described as a *projected* deficit to avoid implying it is a current deficit, but isn't that also technically true for the $1.9 billion deficit to which Gil Duran refers? Administrations tend to use overly optimistic projections, and I wouldn't be surprised if, when the time comes to pass, the actual numbers are higher.

adam_zander
adam_zander

@BrassNucklez @FoxNews **We need to Criminalize "FOX NEWS" in America as it is in CANADA,they dont allow that SHIT!!!!**

BrassNucklez
BrassNucklez

@adam_zander Sadly, @FoxNews is shown in Canada; at least I saw it in Vancouver. But it's also known that Canadians laugh at #FOXnews.

AtlasShrugged
AtlasShrugged

It's ironic that the same administration that so blatantly lied about the extent of its tax proposal would take issue with an organization reporting on it. 

Brown repeatedly said that millionaires only would see a 3% increase in their tax rate.  What he should have said was that the tax rate would increase 3 points, a full +30% tax increase.  Of course, why expect the governor to accurately depict the size of the tax increase when he continued to confuse those making $250K with those making $1MM.  

What's more alarming is the fact that a private company making the same claims would be the poster child for private enterprise greed pursued to death by the liberals in Sacramento.  Is it any wonder why the rest of the country looks at California and laughs.  

BillStewart2012
BillStewart2012 like.author.displayName 1 Like

I don't watch Fox News (ewww...), but Jerry Brown's "you're all going to hate this budget" budgets still haven't been willing to get real about either tax revenues or expenditures.  If the economy gets better fast, there's some chance of getting toward balance, but if it doesn't, there will still be major shortfalls and higher costs.   They're better than what most of the Democrats would like (and since most of the Republicans pretend that their pork barrel spending doesn't require taxes to pay for it, their opinions don't count), but we're not only going to hate it, we're going to hate it a lot.


Back in the Gray Davis years, the legislature looked at the inrush of tax money from the dotcom boom, predicted it would keep growing even though the boom was already going bust, and locked in that spending, mostly in pension plans.  Governator Arnold said he'd fix it, but mostly swept the problems under the rug, since he couldn't get the two parties to cooperate.  Maybe Jerry will do better.

Now Trending

From the Vault

 

©2013 SF Weekly, LP, All rights reserved.
Browse Voice Nation
  • Voice Places San Francisco / Bay Area

    Voice Places

    Find everything you're looking for in your city

  • Happy Hour App

    Happy Hour App

    Find the best happy hour deals in your city

  • Daily Deals

    Daily Deals

    Get today's exclusive deals at savings of anywhere from 50-90%

  • Best Of

    Best Of...

    Check out the hottest list of places and things to do around your city