There Are No Conservatives Worth Following on Social Media

Categories: Tech
Thumbnail image for Thumbnail image for Thumbnail image for Thumbnail image for Thumbnail image for Thumbnail image for Thumbnail image for Thumbnail image for Thumbnail image for Thumbnail image for Thumbnail image for DigitalTremorsHeader-1.jpg

"Follow liberally," exhorts Liz Heron. "You never know who will lead you to discover something unique or important." This is one of "The Rules of Social Media" that Fast Company thinks we all should adhere to.

Heron, who runs social media for the Wall Street Journal, doesn't mean "liberally" in a political sense. But if she did, I would tell her that I don't really have any choice: When it comes to politics, there are no conservatives worth following. This is not good for the conservative movement, and it's not good for America.

Heron is right: The more different kinds of people you follow on Facebook and Twitter, the more likely it is you will come upon something interesting or useful that you might not see if you limit yourself too much. (On the other hand, it's certainly possible to be too liberal -- if you're following tens of thousands of people on Twitter, are you really following anyone at all?)

Social media has the ability to bring us the "serendipity" that was supposedly lost with the advent of new media. Critics of new media warn that we're all encasing ourselves in our own little bubbles, paying attention only to people with whom we already agree. My own experience is just the opposite: I see a lot more different stuff now than I did when all I had was print and broadcast news.

That includes conservative opinion journalism. I see a lot more of it than I used to. The difference is that now, it's nearly all nonsense -- and that's when it's not outright insane. I don't seek it out; it just makes its way into my feed, usually when it's being mocked by one of the smart people I follow. Rush Limbaugh this week declared that President Obama engineered the Chicago teachers' strike so that he could step in and save the day to boost his electoral chances. Before new media, I never heard anything Limbaugh said. Now I hear it all the time.

I've always been open to all credible, honest opinions, including from the right. Before new media came along, I read George Will all the time. And William Safire. And Bill Buckley. And James Kilpatrick. And Robert Novak, who actually did reporting for the column he wrote with Rowland Evans, providing more analysis than mere polemics. I regularly disagreed with all of these people, but I was able to read them, and learn from them, because they were, for the most part, honest brokers. Partisan, but honest. Novak eventually revealed himself to be the Prince of Darkness, and then he died. The rest of them are dead, too, except for Will -- but he's degenerated horribly. I stopped paying attention entirely after he wrote his diatribe against "denim blue jeans" a few years back.

And what are we left with? You might think someone like Erick Erickson might offer something of substance, given that CNN decided he was worth that network's money and airtime. These days, though, the support of CNN means less than nothing. Erickson was chosen only for "balance" by news executives who are driven by ratings, fear, and cluelessness. Erickson is as hacky as the rest of them -- all clichés, empty talking points, and lies. He's an Internet commenter with a big salary.

I really, really want to follow conservatives on social media, but I can't, because they're nearly all hacks now. I tried some libertarians such as the once-very-good Reason magazine and its writers and editors, but among their many other problems, they have allied themselves with the likes of John Stossel, who is about as big a buffoon as a person can be without actually putting on a clown suit. Give me a break, indeed.

Most recently, I tried David Frum, who to his credit is willing to disagree with his ideological cohorts -- even to the point of being labeled an apostate and cast out. But when it comes to it, he's just as much of a witless propagandist as any of them. The New York Times today published an astonishing report by Kurt Eichenwald revealing that the Bush administration was warned far more before 9/11 about an impending attack by al Qaeda than had been previously known. Frum responded with an appalling bit of hackwork that doesn't even really acknowledge Eichenwald's revelations -- whereupon I dumped Frum from my Facebook feed.  With his departure, that feed is now almost bereft of conservative or libertarian thought. I think that's a shame.

I follow lots of liberals on social media. Yes, I tend to agree with them more than I do with conservatives -- but that's just the point. I want to also follow people with whom I disagree. I just want them to not be cheap, disingenuous hacks and water-carriers. I have the same test for liberals. The people I follow, such as Salon's Alex Pareene and Mother Jones' Kevin Drum, reliably acknowledge and address the facts that might weigh against their arguments. I don't follow feeds like those from Daily Kos or Michael Moore.

Of the few remaining conservatives who might have something to offer, none are on social media. Frank Fukuyama, sadly, doesn't participate much, and ex-pols who are still on the circuit, like Allan Simpson and George Schultz, don't do social media. Who else is there? Serious question -- I'm open to recommendations.

Meanwhile, the fact that the right has almost nobody left who might appeal to non-allies/moderates/non-partisans -- especially the younger ones who get most of their information via social media -- can't be a good sign for the future of the conservative movement. And if you care at all about the future of American democracy, you'll find that disturbing.

Dan Mitchell has written for Fortune, the New York Times, Slate, Wired, National Public Radio, the Chicago Tribune, and many others.

Follow us on Twitter at @TheSnitchSF and @SFWeekly

My Voice Nation Help
38 comments
jravenet
jravenet

@fondalo Gotta say, there are several conservatives whom I find very much worth following, e.g. @blackrepublican @ToriGlass and @JvilleJosh

rajsonja
rajsonja

This "article" is hysterically funny. There really is a reason liberals are ignorant. "Hey, if I can not fit you into my pyridine, you are not really heret"...............hahahahahahahahahah

BrianOCTweet
BrianOCTweet

@romenesko He pretty much sums it up, unless he wants to add, "total intellectual frauds.

pjrodriguez
pjrodriguez

@romenesko All the good ones I might recommend are essentially libertarians. But I'm sure there are some.

bberwyn
bberwyn

@romenesko I had the same question during the convention. Someone suggested @davidfrum

Yair_Rosenberg
Yair_Rosenberg

@romenesko Try @DouthatNYT, @wrmead, @reihan, @philipaklein for starters. Hacks = people who call entire community hacks w/o knowledge of it

beckyyerak
beckyyerak

@romenesko I'd also recommend @joelpollak

beckyyerak
beckyyerak

@romenesko Has he tried following @michellemalkin?

4vines
4vines

@freddoso @SonnyBunch: Ur article wld be laughable if isn't wasn't sooo egotistical.

MrDewMaster
MrDewMaster

@romenesko And all #liberals are either #gay, #black, #mexican, socialist, or #idiots. About equally divided I think.

BorzoiBystander
BorzoiBystander

@romenesko @DanielLarison @conor64 @daveweigel Are definitely not hacks.

JamesDDetroit
JamesDDetroit

@romenesko Byron York, David Frum, Matt Lewis, Philip Klein, Tim Carney. Solid conservatives, all. Not a hack among 'em.

blakehounshell
blakehounshell

@romenesko David Frum is not a hack and neither are many others, e.g. Byron York.

pabarge
pabarge

@jpodhoretz He gets to join the next #Journolist

Reagan_Lady
Reagan_Lady

This is absolutely hilarious. A++ trolling! Now, I've got to run off & read all the tweets from all the marvelous Conservatives on Twitter.

kgal1298
kgal1298

Honestly these days I'd just like to hear from someone who isn't making a living being brutally liberal or conservative, but had an even eye on everything without the thought of money in the way. Money is a source of evil and sadly today it has too much power. 

JammieWF
JammieWF

@TheSnitchSF Trolling for attention, huh? Don't have many followers yourself, ironically.

njudah
njudah topcommenter

I like to hear from all sides, because no one side has a monopoly on good ideas or the truth, but it seems lately the conservatives have become like liberals in the 70s - google eye crazy. I get the  direct mail from the RNC and other conservative think tanks and PACs and some of the things in there are flat out insane. They come up with these vast conspiracy theories that defy any sort of logic. It's embarassing. The only good thing is that many of them send out dollar bills in the hopes you'll send them more money, so I keep the dollars and use them to pay for tips at the bar.

jameswester
jameswester

@jpodhoretz A modern technological twist on the "all the good conservatives are dead" trope. Now all the good conservatives don't tweet.

morganwarstler
morganwarstler

@pegobry never know if this means Dan's worthless (boo) or if he his odd readership needs this stuff and gives them what they want (yay)

cynicusprime
cynicusprime

#journalism RT @TPCarney There Are No Conservatives Worth Following on Social Media - San Francisco - News - The Snitch http://t.co/9mWnNbT0

RebeccaEast2
RebeccaEast2

@SFWeekly No conservatives worth following on social media? Try @TobinCommentary @philipaklein @kausmickey @JRubinBlogger @ByronYork

RebeccaEast2
RebeccaEast2

@SFWeekly No conservatives worth following on social media ? Try @NolteNC @TimJGraham And @jamestaranto is very followed and very funny.

RebeccaEast2
RebeccaEast2

@SFWeekly No conservatives worth following on social media? Get out of George Will era and into that of @michellemalkin and @TwitchyTeam

RebeccaEast2
RebeccaEast2

@SFWeekly No conservatives worth following on social media? Get out the George Will era and into that of @michellemalkin and @TwitchyTeam

DCdoozy
DCdoozy

@SFWeekly Yo! We're out here. Right in the Bay Area, believe it or not.

HeyItsFrawnky
HeyItsFrawnky

@SFWeekly Curds they don't have a sense of humor

fondalo
fondalo

@jravenet @blackrepublican @ToriGlass @JvilleJosh agreed! I AM one! :-)

JvilleJosh
JvilleJosh

@jravenet @fondalo @blackrepublican @ToriGlass Thanks dude!

ToriGlass
ToriGlass

@jravenet thank you!! Huge compliment coming from you, good sir. :) @fondalo @blackrepublican @jvillejosh

joelpollak
joelpollak

@beckyyerak @romenesko Thanks for the endorsement. I am fabulously hack-tastic, however.

DanMitchell
DanMitchell

 @njudah "like liberals in the 70s - google eye crazy" Indeed, but it was even worse in the 80s, when it was fully institutionalized - especially on college campuses (where I happened to be.) But even that was nothing compared to what we have today on the right.

pegobry
pegobry

@morganwarstler It can be both.

jravenet
jravenet

@fondalo @blackrepublican @toriglass @jvillejosh I thought so! LOL

njudah
njudah topcommenter

 @mitchell39 hmm good point. I went to college in the late 80s/early 90s and there was that particular brand of crazy where people would freak out over little things like it was the apocalypse. I attended a particularly lefty school (UCSC), which was crazy central. But the views of the ocean were amazing lol

DanMitchell
DanMitchell

 @njudah I went to a third-tier state college in the Midwest that was heavily populated by frat lunkheads. And yet the "PC" crowd *still* wielded all kinds of unwarranted, sometimes scary, power.

Now Trending

From the Vault

 

©2014 SF Weekly, LP, All rights reserved.
Loading...