Gold Dust Lounge Isn't Really a Historic Landmark, Report Says

Categories: Local News
Thumbnail image for Thumbnail image for Thumbnail image for Thumbnail image for Thumbnail image for gold dust image 2.jpg
Unquestionable fun, questionable future
Next week, the city's Historic Preservation Commission will decide whether the Gold Dust Lounge is indeed a historic landmark. The problem is that even if the commission gives the bar a "landmark status," that doesn't mean the popular lounge will remain a watering hole.

According to a city report issued yesterday, only some physical features of the bar are historic enough to be protected. That means the bar could still be turned into the planned Express clothing store, as long as the retailer preserved the physical features of the bar, the report says.

But that's just one report, according to Lee Houskeeper, spokesman for the bar. This report -- which comes from staff working with the Historic Landmark Commission -- won't make or break the future of the lounge.

"It's just a rebuttal to our nomination [for historic landmark status]," Houskeeper told us.
 
Houskeeper says that after the release of this report, the Gold Dust Lounge may ask the commission to hold off on making a decision on the bar's status while lawyers and historians work out their own rebuttal to this "rebuttal."

Still, the report could be considered one point for Jon Handlery, the landlord who wants to boot the bar and put a retail clothing store in its place. The bar's lease ended March 10, but instead of packing up the premises, the Bovis brothers, who own the Gold Dust, threw an all-day "No Last Call" bash, refusing to leave.

Meanwhile, Supervisor Christina Olague has started her own efforts to keep the quirky Union Square bar intact, with legislation proposing a moratorium on conversions in the Union Square district.

"Any one of these things, if we lost, isn't going to knock us out, and anything we win isn't going to be our savior, but in combination all of it works to save the Gold Dust," Houskeeper told us. "It's a long process, and it could conceivably go on several years."

Follow us on Twitter at @SFWeekly and @TheSnitchSF  

My Voice Nation Help
3 comments
Sort: Newest | Oldest
Sfmag1
Sfmag1

Don't forget to play the Live Music venue" card.

generic_
generic_

"Several years," yes. 

C.W. Nevius always bitches about the glacial pace of city government. Personally, I like slow, deliberate processes. They keep local interests from being railroaded by corporate profiteers.

MrEricSir
MrEricSir

 Unfortunately that same slow process also kills locally-owned businesses.  Not everyone has the cash to rent a storefront for 8 years while the permits come through.  But big corporations?  That's not a problem for them.

Now Trending

From the Vault

 

©2014 SF Weekly, LP, All rights reserved.
Loading...