"Emperor Norton Bridge" Turns 75
|The man, the bridge, the resolution...|
So most of us probably don't remember that our Board of Supervisors actually went on record favoring the bridge be rechristened after San Francisco's most famous lunatic.
In 2004, the board, by an 8-2 vote, passed a resolution "urging the California Department of Transportation and members of the California Assembly and Senate to name the new additions to the San Francisco Bay Bridge in honor of Emperor Norton I, Emperor of the United States and Protector of Mexico."
As SF Weekly has written before, Joshua Abraham Norton (and, yes he was) is either a symbol of San Francisco's longtime laudable tolerance for eccentricity -- or our disturbing ability to ignore the loud, disruptive, and mentally ill. Or both.
The sole remaining member of the Board of Supervisors from the days of the Emperor Norton Bridge resolution is Sean Elsbernd. Along with Fiona Ma, he voted against it (Michela Alioto-Pier was absent). Asked why he showed no love for the emperor, Elsbernd laughed and uttered "Jesus Christ!
"I'm sure I voted against it because I thought it was silly, and the board has some more important things to worry about than Emperor Norton Bridges," he continued. "And I'm also sure I probably spent all of 30 seconds thinking about it and haven't thought about it since."
We'll let you guess what Elsbernd's response was when asked if the Department of Transportation, the state Assembly, and state Senate -- let alone the elected representatives of Oakland -- would come around to San Francisco's resolved position on renaming the bridge after Norton. Here's a hint: It wasn't "yes."
Follow us on Twitter at @SFWeekly and @TheSnitchSF