Family Court Evaluator Spied on Employees with Hidden Bathroom Camera

Sounds like you have some issues. Obviously people who don't get what they want hate the ones who ruled against them. Something to think about... Evaluator Harshman never blogs negatively about anyone. That is a sign of a true professional. That Attorney Pat Barry that everyone is talking about only has negative things to say. Losers always complain and claim things were unjust.

I like how all of the bad remarks are obviously various aliases of one person  - that sick FUCKER BRUCE HARSHMAN!! Everyone who knows anything in the world of law in California knows that he is a fraud who pays everyone off to keep quiet. He is a sick bastard. Just spend a few minutes researching the internet.  Forget about Pat Barry..... he is just trying to deflect from the REAL issue at hand!  He could care less about the welfare of the poor children which is his supposed job, I am amazed he is not behind bars yet....YET...he will be though, there are enough people that have witnessed money exchanged right under judges noses. Bruce Harshman is the worst of the worst kind of person there are hundreds of people who would and will attest to that, many, many stories and he repeats the same pattern of dishonest and unethical behavior and has only been able to slip through this flawed system because these judges cannot admit that they put these cases and childrens lives in the twisted hands of such a monster, but, he will be exposed for what he has done...my child remembers, and soon the entire world will know who he really is.

August 15, 2011PATRICIA JOAN BARRY [#59116], 68, of Los Angeles was suspended for two years, stayed, placed on two years of probation with a 60-day actual suspension and she was ordered to take the MPRE within one year. The order took effect July 29, 2011. The actual suspension was postponed until Aug. 15, 2011.

Barry stipulated that she pursued cases without merit. She filed a series of lawsuits on behalf of a client that included charges of taking a child from her parents, conspiracy and making a false claim of child abuse and neglect. Barry appealed after most of the claims were dismissed (including an appeal to the Supreme Court). Granting a request by the other side for attorney’s fees after Barry’s petitions were denied, one court called her actions “groundless and vexatious” and said the case “was unreasonable, frivolous, meritless.”Barry also filed a case against opposing counsel, a court commissioner and three Los Angeles superior court judges, charging among other things violation of her client’s due process and equal protection rights. The court ultimately said the claims were “groundless and without foundation.” Barry was privately reproved in 2005, but did not comply with probation conditions. She took and failed the MPRE twice.

August 15, 2011PATRICIA JOAN BARRY [#59116], 68, of Los Angeles was suspended for two years, stayed, placed on two years of probation with a 60-day actual suspension and she was ordered to take the MPRE within one year. The order took effect July 29, 2011. The actual suspension was postponed until Aug. 15, 2011.

Barry stipulated that she pursued cases without merit. She filed a series of lawsuits on behalf of a client that included charges of taking a child from her parents, conspiracy and making a false claim of child abuse and neglect. Barry appealed after most of the claims were dismissed (including an appeal to the Supreme Court). Granting a request by the other side for attorney’s fees after Barry’s petitions were denied, one court called her actions “groundless and vexatious” and said the case “was unreasonable, frivolous, meritless.”Barry also filed a case against opposing counsel, a court commissioner and three Los Angeles superior court judges, charging among other things violation of her client’s due process and equal protection rights. The court ultimately said the claims were “groundless and without foundation.” Barry was privately reproved in 2005, but did not comply with probation conditions. She took and failed the MPRE twice.

August 15, 2011PATRICIA JOAN BARRY [#59116], 68, of Los Angeles was suspended for two years, stayed, placed on two years of probation with a 60-day actual suspension and she was ordered to take the MPRE within one year. The order took effect July 29, 2011. The actual suspension was postponed until Aug. 15, 2011.

Barry stipulated that she pursued cases without merit. She filed a series of lawsuits on behalf of a client that included charges of taking a child from her parents, conspiracy and making a false claim of child abuse and neglect. Barry appealed after most of the claims were dismissed (including an appeal to the Supreme Court). Granting a request by the other side for attorney’s fees after Barry’s petitions were denied, one court called her actions “groundless and vexatious” and said the case “was unreasonable, frivolous, meritless.”Barry also filed a case against opposing counsel, a court commissioner and three Los Angeles superior court judges, charging among other things violation of her client’s due process and equal protection rights. The court ultimately said the claims were “groundless and without foundation.” Barry was privately reproved in 2005, but did not comply with probation conditions. She took and failed the MPRE twice..

August 15, 2011PATRICIA JOAN BARRY [#59116], 68, of Los Angeles was suspended for two years, stayed, placed on two years of probation with a 60-day actual suspension and she was ordered to take the MPRE within one year. The order took effect July 29, 2011. The actual suspension was postponed until Aug. 15, 2011.

Barry stipulated that she pursued cases without merit. She filed a series of lawsuits on behalf of a client that included charges of taking a child from her parents, conspiracy and making a false claim of child abuse and neglect. Barry appealed after most of the claims were dismissed (including an appeal to the Supreme Court). Granting a request by the other side for attorney’s fees after Barry’s petitions were denied, one court called her actions “groundless and vexatious” and said the case “was unreasonable, frivolous, meritless.”Barry also filed a case against opposing counsel, a court commissioner and three Los Angeles superior court judges, charging among other things violation of her client’s due process and equal protection rights. The court ultimately said the claims were “groundless and without foundation.” Barry was privately reproved in 2005, but did not comply with probation conditions. She took and failed the MPRE twice.

do u know why she was suspended?

Oh my gosh, I have had experience with Patricia Barry. She was just recently suspended again for misconduct by the state bar and cant pass a simple test. Why don't they just take her license. She is not professional and has no clue what she's doing in family court. Last time I saw her in court she seemed drunk. Not steady on her feet, crying, and running out of the courtroom. What kind of attorney is that?

I agree with you all. Pat Barry cannot be trusted. I wouldn't believe anything she says or supplys to the courts

August 15, 2011PATRICIA JOAN BARRY [#59116], 68, of Los Angeles was suspended for two years, stayed, placed on two years of probation with a 60-day actual suspension and she was ordered to take the MPRE within one year. The order took effect July 29, 2011. The actual suspension was postponed until Aug. 15, 2011.

Barry stipulated that she pursued cases without merit. She filed a series of lawsuits on behalf of a client that included charges of taking a child from her parents, conspiracy and making a false claim of child abuse and neglect. Barry appealed after most of the claims were dismissed (including an appeal to the Supreme Court). Granting a request by the other side for attorney’s fees after Barry’s petitions were denied, one court called her actions “groundless and vexatious” and said the case “was unreasonable, frivolous, meritless.”Barry also filed a case against opposing counsel, a court commissioner and three Los Angeles superior court judges, charging among other things violation of her client’s due process and equal protection rights. The court ultimately said the claims were “groundless and without foundation.” Barry was privately reproved in 2005, but did not comply with probation conditions. She took and failed the MPRE twice.