S.F. Homeless People: How Many Are There Really?

Thumbnail image for rsz_homeless_journalist.jpg
Does this count?
Earlier this year, we told you about a survey that said tourists feel the worst thing about visiting San Francisco is the incessant panhandling -- they hate it even more than fog at the beach.

But here's some news that's sure not to help reform our gritty image: There are now only 6,455 homeless residents of San Francisco, down from 6,514 in 2009. You see the word "decline" and it seems positive, but some back-of-the-cardboard-box math will tell you the drop in our street population is only 59 people -- and even the city will tell you that's not much.

And because being homeless is technically illegal, it's not really possible to get a full count of how many people are roaming the streets without a place to call home.

Every two years, the city makes its best effort to tally up the number of homeless people living in San Francisco. Volunteers walk specific routes, collecting information and tracking homeless residents on the streets or in shelters. This year, hoping to get a more accurate picture, the city counted the homeless population in jails and hospitals -- something that has not been done before.

But even then, the picture isn't perfect.

"The fact is the count misses a lot," says Bob Offer-Westort, the civil rights organizer for the Coalition on Homelessness. "But I don't think the city is masking anything. It's the same problem everywhere -- nobody is getting a through count."

But what is worth noting is Offer-Westort says there were fewer volunteers counting on the night of Jan. 27. This year, there were only 338, which some homeless activists say is far fewer than what the city has drafted in previous years. The number of volunteers makes a difference, Offer-Westort says.

"The more volunteers, the more that are counted," he tells SF Weekly.

But Dariush Kayhan, deputy director for the Mayor's Office of Housing, says that 338 people was more than enough to get the job done. "We've gotten much better at pre-survey work, so we are more efficient and more effective at knowing where homeless people are prior to deploying the volunteers," he says.

As for the latest tally? Kayhan is the first to admit it's not a perfect science -- and there's no way to make it one. Still, he is pleased with the 1 percent decline in the street population, despite the fact that the number of homeless families skyrocketed from 549 in 2009 to to 635 in 2011.

"It's not a lot, but given that we had a decrease at all in this sustained economic downturn, I think it's fairly impressive," Kayhan says.

What will be even more impressive is if San Francisco reaches its stated goal and ends chronic homelessness by 2014.   

Follow us on Twitter at @SFWeekly and @TheSnitchSF

My Voice Nation Help

I grew up in the Lower East Side of Manhattan in the 80's and we were inundated with panhandlers. Don't ask how many times I was chased, mugged/etc. Then came (R) Guiliani and magically the area changed. Some claimed he was too tough on crime/drugs. I say the prior administration was too lazy/scared to address it. You'll find most of the cities that have this problem are (D) cities - they intentionally do not touch this issue out of fear of racism/etc. You don't see chinese/orthodox jewish/Indian panhandlers on crack, do you? Let's be REAL.


Isn't frisco the santuary city? you asked for it and you got it.  The worst is yet to come for the "Bay City" ("Gay City") with all your decadent "Pelosi" madness !  On the hand, the best future for frisco is to crumble into the sea along with the rest of California !!!  (Flush America's toilet)

Now Trending

From the Vault


©2014 SF Weekly, LP, All rights reserved.