Safeway Sued for Selling Cheaper Gasoline

• Just have to say, I couldn't agree more with your comment. You said exactly what I was thinking.

• Disgusting! Another example of collusive monopolistic activity, using private entities using the government to keep up prices, forcing the consumer to pay more for less!

• So, hmmm...  Why didn't Home Depot raise prices when all the little hardware stores went out of business?  Why hasn't Walmart raised prices when the little drugstores went out of business? Why didn't Guitar Center raise prices when the hometown music stores disappeared.  This isn't the 1890's.  Capitalism is good and I like big box stores.  Little stores that fill a unique niche are still around.  The little stores that only survived by overcharging us when they had their little, local monopoly are gone.  All the overpriced, independant gas stations in my area all seem to charge exactly the same price and change prices simultaneously when the price does change.  Fix prices much?  Maybe that's where the lawsuit should be.  They're going after Safeway because Safeway is messing up their sweet deal.

• Celebrate!! The greedy are telling on themselves.  Boycott the greedy, buck the petulent entitled, and vote with your wheels!!  John Higgins

• If you don't like the price of gas, walk or bike.................actually gas is still cheap

• This is actually a legitimate lawsuit. Predatory pricing is the practice of selling something at below cost in order to drive competition out of the market, and then raising the cost after the smaller companies get put out of business. There is a reason it's illegal, and the law needs to be enforced. Safeway's club card and food receipts are irrelevant, but they cannot sell gas below cost.

• Or their competitors could just lower their gas prices too. One would assume the cost of entry, and to maintain a gas station thereafter, is pretty universal, so at some point they'd all have to stop at around the same lower price. Wait, isn't that how capitalism is supposed to work? Odd.

• Indeed. It's an attempt to buy a monopoly by exploiting the cost of entry (setting up a new gas station) as a means to keep competitors out once they've been shut down by the initial maneuver. I wouldn't be surprised if there were another side to the story, though.

• They are being accused of predatory pricing. Once their competitors are out of business, they raise prices quite quickly, ultimately screwing consumers. That is why it is illegal. This is such a badly written article, I can understand why Brooks and A@B didn't understand.

• i'm with Brooks.. you don't like it, lower your prices too!

• Sounds like they need to be suing Capitalism instead...

TotalComments: 11