Giffords Shooting: Was it Politics or Just Mental Illness?
 |
| Critical Condition |
But in Phoenix, 113 miles from Tucson where the shooting occurred outside a supermarket, the Phoenix New Times, part of Village Voice Media, points out that it is mental illness, not passionate politics behind the weekend shooting.
"The shallow, self-serving calls for the moderation of rhetoric, for the elimination of passionate politics, for the muzzling of the Tea Party's adoption of an American symbol of the revolution -- a gun -- is a hypocritical repudiation of this nation's particular embrace of principle," writes Michael Lacey, executive editor of Village Voice Media, which owns SF Weekly.
 |
| How Does This Look? |
Immediately after the shooting, Republicans were on the defensive, accusing liberals of turning them into villains and demonizing conservatives.
The Village Voice summed up the thoughts of a slew of right-wing bloggers who speculate that the accused shooter, Jared Loughner, was in fact a left-wing nut, not a right-wing nut.
"Loughner was a 'left-winger' who listed amongst his favorite books The Communist Manifesto," wrote Paul Joseph Watson.
Conservatives were aghast when the sheriff in Tucson told reporters that the shooting was the result of the vitriolic political climate in Arizona.
"Because a lunatic decided to kill others in a bid to give his worthless life some meaning, Americans are being ordered to shut their mouths about Obamacare, endless bailouts, and the fact that their political representatives in Washington (with some notable exceptions) have ceased to represent their interests," Watson said.
Email to Friend
Write to Editor
Print Article
