Pet-Friendly Cities List Snubs San Francisco

Categories: Animals, internets
service-with-a-snarl.3516392.40.jpg
San Francisco manages to land on ever so many Top-10 lists; if ever a Top-10 list was assembled of cities that crack the most Top-10 lists, it's a good bet we'd make the Top-10.

Now a website called Livability.com has sent along yet another list -- the Top 10 Pet-Friendly Cities. Astoundingly, the city with more dogs than children; the city named after St. Francis of Assisi; the city where, for God's sake, you can take your goddamn animal anywhere you want -- did not make the cut.

Our calls to the site and its marketing people have not yet been returned. Here, by the way, are the locales deigned pet-friendlier than San Francisco:

Top 10 Pet Friendly Cities: 1. Portland, Ore.; 2. Colorado Springs, Colo.; 3. Rocky Mount, NC; 4. Boulder, Colo; 5. Santa Cruz, Calif.; 6. Eugene, Ore.; 7. Asheville, NC; 8. Albuquerque, NM; 9. Nashville, Tenn.; 10. Louisville, Ky.

The rationale behind these selections is not listed anywhere on the Livability site. The only explanation is this paragraph:

These cities have pet friendly parks and trails, quality veterinary care, active animal welfare groups, as well as an abundance of pet boutiques and retail shops. To make the list, these cities had to be more than pet friendly. They also had to offer an exceptionally high quality of life for the owners who love those pets. From quality healthcare and higher education to diverse job opportunities and active artistic and cultural scenes, these cities are some of the best places to work, live and play in America.

Huh. Sounds rather San Franciscan. We eagerly await a response explaining this dog's breakfast of a list. In the meantime, be careful not to step on Livability.com's methodology.

Update, 2:30 p.m.: This just in from Livability's PR people --

Due to the high cost of living in San Francisco, the city did not make the list. While San Francisco ranked highly in the pet-friendly factors like quality veterinary care, places to walk dogs, and livability factors like vibrant arts and cultural scene and great food, the high cost of living took San Francisco out of the top 10.

Look, your humble narrator doesn't have a horse in this race (though, in San Francisco, I could take a horse into City Hall and say he's my service steed). But this hardly seems relevant to a city's pet-friendliness. By this rationale, San Francisco -- or New York, or any other pricey city -- isn't eligible for any list.

Follow us on Twitter at @TheSnitchSF and @SFWeekly 

My Voice Nation Help
0 comments
Sort: Newest | Oldest

Now Trending

From the Vault

 

©2014 SF Weekly, LP, All rights reserved.
Loading...