Prop. 8 Backers Cover Their Asses

• I know. It happens to be pretty challenging to know the difference between the pair of these. They are both Usa haters, hell bent on its devastation. Both of them criticize The states and Americans ceaselessly. Here's a hint, Barak may be the one at present being successful in wrecking The nation.

• A persons sexual orientation doesn't effect their ability to make an education decision. Why do morons like @Frank make being homosexual a disease that makes people unable to make educated decisions. BTW, these prop 8 supporters should be worried about saving heterosexual marriages. With over half of all marriages failing in CA, I think this is a bigger issue. But again, it is always easier to rally around the minority, then deal with the real issues that marriage is simply a legal document that is registered with the state. Since their is a separation of state and religion, this shouldn't be an issue in the first place. I should be able to marry a freaking tree if I choose. Why others care is beyond me.

• Fact: If the logic that a gay judge is incapable of deciding a case based on the facts holds true...then no straight judge is qualified to make any ruling involving the civil rights of heterosexuals. You cant have it both ways.

• @Frank: Fact: You're a moron.

• Fact: Judge Walker is an active homosexual. Fact: Judge Walker is currently involved in a homosexual relationship (with a physician, I believe) Some say that if SSM was legal in CA, the judge would take advantage by "marrying" his SS partner. This constitutes serious conflict of interest, and by any standard of measure, the judge should have done the right thing and recuse himself. Should a justice with an active interest in the outcome of a case like this have a right to decide the legal status of SSM in CA -- and ultimately the U.S.? THAT is why the pro-prop 8 side is filing for a stay in judgement!

• Does preemptively requesting that the court stay their judgement if they rule against you, because you plan to appeal anyway, constitute open disrespect of the court? If so, the more succinct term to describe their actions is "contempt of court".

• They don't mind that *they're* doing irreparable harm to couples who want to get married, but they want to protect them by not letting them get married while they're running their appeal? Wow, thanks, guys!

TotalComments: 7