Republicans Following Porn on Twitter (NSFW)

Categories: Politics, internets
_PrettyAllison.jpg
By following @_PrettyAlison, the California GOP studied the body politic...
If you're going to get hit with a sex scandal, you should at least make sure to enjoy the sex. Yet the California Republican Party has been monitoring the online offerings of dozens of porn purveyors in a situation that gains the GOP neither pleasure nor profit.

Amid the roughly 4,300 Twitter users @CAGOP is following, you'll find more than a few accounts held by folks whose idea of a party likely has little to do with politics.

If names like @vsex and @HotNSexyAnne didn't give away lascivious intentions, perhaps profile photos of pendulous breasts crammed into microscopic tank tops and close-ups of Daisy Dukes-clad posteriors ought to have gotten the message across. Yet the state GOP opted to follow these users' Twitter accounts, which are one-click portals to porn sites, X-rated webcams, and live chats.

Republican Twitter Porn woman05.JPG
The state GOP wants you to vote for Meg Whitman. Woman05 wants something else.

Pearls of wisdom to be gleaned from these Twitter users on the GOP's watch list are rich and varied. Says @HotNSexyAnne, "c-u-m to me or I go to you." Notes @VanessaMcKoy, "It's so long since I've had sex, I've forgotten who ties up whom." The apparently bilingual @lillake19 opines, "Ich habe mir gerade ueberlegt ob man im englischen eigentlich auch blowjob zum blasen sagt." And @PicsNice ("Fotos de Jessica Cirio en Bikini Gratis") had only two followers in all the Twitterverse: the California Republican Party and a guy in Peru named Dennis Corpio.


Vsex GOP Twitter.JPG
@CAGOP: Sound like a plan?

Comments (13)

Henry Bernard says:

This is exactly why I don't read SF weekly anymore, where is the story here?

Posted On: Wednesday, Jul. 28 2010 @ 12:30PM
Intarnet says:

Hello thar, Intarnet here, I'm sorry you don't understand how I work, I thought we were good friends. Just wanted to let you know there are things called "bots" online, and these "users" aren't actually real people. Have you never had spam in your life? Do you think that Liberals don't have these. Research fail.

Posted On: Wednesday, Jul. 28 2010 @ 2:12PM
PORNSTAROMGXXX says:

Hey sexy, I'm your biggest fan, thanks for following me on twitter!

Posted On: Wednesday, Jul. 28 2010 @ 2:14PM
PORNSTAROMGXXXXX says:

Hey there IS YOUR PENIS TOO SMALL CUZ I KNOW IN 5 EZ STEPS TO MAKE BIG!

Posted On: Wednesday, Jul. 28 2010 @ 2:19PM
Jayson says:

@ henry Bernard:

Where is the story? Are you serious? This is a group of people that claims to hate anything not Family oriented. Pr0n is not family oriented. This is a group of people that claim what I do in my bedroom behind closed doors is indecent. Yet, they are more than willing to watch acts that are normally behind a door (and if not on a screen are considered indecent). It's pointing out yet another strand of repuglican hypocrisy.

Critical thinking is a good thing. Take a beginning logic class.

Posted On: Wednesday, Jul. 28 2010 @ 2:23PM
Paul says:

Jayson and Henry you are both overreacting.

The story isn't about some Republicans who follow porn stars on twitter.. and are somehow contradicting themselves.

The point is they obviously don't devote very much time or discretion in who they recruit as their followers etc. It's just simple laziness. They probably pay someone to set up the thing (with our tax dollars & campaign contributions). They don't run it, their aid does and they just autofollow anyone who follows them.

That's the real story, which is more of just a laugh at their expense. No big deal either way.

Posted On: Wednesday, Jul. 28 2010 @ 2:29PM
Bryan says:

This is F-grade muckraking. I believe in the hypocrisy of the republican party BUT:

A Twitter exploit existed until a few months ago that allowed users to force others to follow them. You could tweet 'accept [username]' to get any user to follow you.

The way scammers cash in on these exploits is to use them to push pr0n, male enhancement pills, webcams, etc.

Can we really blast the @CAGOP for not noticing this when they have 4000+ followers?

Posted On: Wednesday, Jul. 28 2010 @ 3:10PM
Henry Bernard says:

@ Jason

We have a budget crisis going on, and this is what SF Weekly is reporting on. All this is a a bunch of unnecessary muckraking. Can't this guy find something better to report on.

@Bryan.

Thank you for pointing out the following:

"A Twitter exploit existed until a few months ago that allowed users to force others to follow them. You could tweet 'accept [username]' to get any user to follow you.

The way scammers cash in on these exploits is to use them to push pr0n, male enhancement pills, webcams, etc.

Clearly he did not do his research.

Posted On: Wednesday, Jul. 28 2010 @ 4:13PM
Shatter says:

I wonder how many strippers and sex workers follow Obama and the Democrats?

How many of them auto follow everyone that adds them?

It's one thing if you can drum up a bunch of @ replies in twitter showing a conversations... and that still doesn't mean very much.

Show me a tweet that is legit that a conservative leader openly sent to a call girl that says "I"m coming over to your hotel to fuck" and you still don't have anything. You sure it's a verified account?

Twitter means very little.

Posted On: Wednesday, Jul. 28 2010 @ 8:55PM
ssfv says:

Internet is right: This is a TOTAL research FAIL. Too bad 70 year old politicians know more about how the Internet works than Joe Eskenazi. Just like fat disgusting people can wear thongs at the beach Joe Eskenazi has a right to blog ... but should he? Do you think maybe Joe Eskenazi was planted here by the republicans to make liberals look bad about their poor understanding of Twitter, Social Network, and the Internet in general? There is no reasonable explanation for this.

Posted On: Thursday, Jul. 29 2010 @ 1:26AM
wtf says:

Joe Eskenazi is absolutely the worst blogger off all time. I hope he doesn't delete my comment. This guy is a complete waste of skin. How does he even have a job?

Posted On: Thursday, Jul. 29 2010 @ 4:28AM
brian says:

Not surprising
Considering how enthusiastic they are to engage in and rationalize torture
I'm sure that many of them get off sexually on that kinda stuff

Posted On: Thursday, Jul. 29 2010 @ 10:57AM
BGR says:

Yes there is spam all over Twitter and Facebook. Get over it.

If you want obscene see the current contra costa GOP web site

http://www.contracostagop.com/home_page0.aspx

that can only talk about Tom Del Beccaro who is running for CAGOP Chair has his own quite checkered reputation. It's not about GOP candidates in tough races, it's not about GOP response to Contra Costa going to hell in a hand cart, it's not about cities raising taxes instead of cutting taxes and gold-plated salaries and pensions, its' about Tom. Here's an excerpt


tom tom tom tom tom tom tom tom tom tom tom tom tom tom tom tom tom tom tom tom tom tom tom tom tom tom tom tom tom tom tom tom tom tom tom tom tom tom tom tom tom tom tom tom tom tom tom tom tom tom tom tom tom tom tom tom tom tom tom tom tom tom tom tom tom tom tom tom tom tom tom tom tom tom tom tom tom tom tom tom tom tom tom tom tom tom tom tom tom tom tom tom tom tom tom tom tom tom tom tom tom tom tom tom tom tom tom tom tom tom tom tom tom tom tom tom tom tom tom tom tom tom tom tom tom tom tom tom tom tom tom tom tom tom tom tom tom tom tom tom tom tom tom tom tom tom tom tom tom tom tom tom tom tom tom tom tom tom tom tom tom tom tom tom tom tom tom tom tom tom tom tom tom tom tom tom tom tom tom tom tom tom tom tom tom tom tom tom tom tom tom tom tom tom tom tom tom tom tom tom tom tom tom tom tom tom tom tom tom tom tom tom tom tom tom tom tom tom tom tom tom tom tom tom tom tom tom tom tom tom tom tom tom tom tom tom tom tom tom tom tom tom tom tom tom tom tom tom tom tom tom tom tom tom tom tom tom tom tom tom tom tom tom tom tom tom tom tom tom tom tom tom tom tom tom tom tom tom tom tom tom tom tom tom tom tom tom tom tom tom tom tom tom tom tom tom tom tom tom tom tom tom tom tom tom tom tom tom tom tom tom tom tom tom tom tom tom tom tom tom tom tom tom tom tom tom tom tom tom tom tom tom tom tom tom tom tom tom tom tom tom tom tom tom tom tom tom tom tom tom tom tom tom tom tom tom tom tom tom tom tom tom tom tom tom tom tom tom tom tom tom tom tom tom tom tom tom tom tom tom tom tom tom tom tom tom tom tom tom tom tom tom tom tom tom tom tom tom tom tom tom tom tom tom tom tom tom tom tom tom tom tom tom tom tom tom tom tom tom tom tom tom tom tom tom tom tom tom tom tom tom tom tom tom tom tom tom tom tom tom tom tom tom tom tom tom tom tom tom tom tom tom tom tom tom tom tom tom tom tom tom tom tom tom tom tom tom tom tom tom tom tom tom tom tom tom tom tom tom tom tom tom tom tom tom tom tom tom tom tom tom tom tom tom tom tom tom tom tom tom tom tom tom tom tom tom tom tom tom tom tom tom tom tom tom tom tom tom tom tom tom tom tom tom tom tom tom tom tom tom tom tom tom tom tom tom tom tom tom tom tom tom tom tom tom tom tom tom tom tom tom tom tom tom tom tom tom tom tom tom tom tom tom tom tom tom tom tom tom tom tom tom tom tom tom tom tom tom tom tom tom tom tom tom tom tom tom tom tom tom tom tom tom tom tom tom tom tom tom tom tom tom tom tom tom tom tom tom tom tom tom tom tom tom tom tom tom tom tom tom tom tom tom tom tom tom tom tom tom tom tom tom tom tom tom tom tom tom tom tom tom tom tom tom tom tom tom tom tom tom tom tom tom tom tom tom tom tom tom tom tom tom tom tom tom tom tom tom tom tom tom tom tom tom tom tom tom tom tom tom tom tom tom tom tom tom tom tom tom tom tom tom tom tom tom tom tom tom tom tom tom tom tom tom tom tom tom tom tom tom tom tom tom tom tom tom tom tom tom tom tom tom tom tom tom tom tom tom tom tom tom tom tom tom tom tom tom tom tom tom tom tom tom tom tom tom tom tom tom tom tom tom tom tom tom tom tom tom tom tom tom tom tom tom tom tom tom tom tom tom tom tom tom tom tom tom tom tom tom tom tom tom tom tom tom tom tom tom tom tom tom tom tom tom tom tom tom tom tom tom tom tom tom tom tom tom tom tom tom tom tom tom tom tom tom tom tom tom tom tom tom tom tom tom tom tom tom tom tom tom tom tom tom tom tom tom tom tom tom tom tom tom tom tom tom tom tom tom tom tom tom tom tom tom tom tom tom tom tom tom tom tom tom tom tom tom tom tom tom tom tom tom tom tom tom tom tom tom tom tom tom tom tom tom tom tom tom tom tom tom tom tom tom tom tom tom tom tom tom tom tom tom tom tom tom tom tom tom tom tom tom tom tom tom tom tom tom tom tom tom tom tom tom tom tom tom tom tom tom tom tom tom tom tom tom tom tom tom tom tom tom tom tom tom tom tom tom tom tom tom tom tom tom tom tom tom tom tom tom tom tom tom tom tom tom tom tom tom tom tom tom tom tom tom tom tom tom tom tom tom tom tom tom tom tom tom tom tom tom tom tom tom tom tom tom tom tom tom tom tom tom tom tom tom tom tom tom tom tom tom tom tom tom tom tom tom tom tom tom tom tom tom tom tom tom tom tom tom tom tom tom tom tom tom tom tom tom tom tom tom tom tom tom tom tom tom tom tom tom tom tom tom tom tom tom tom tom tom tom tom tom tom tom tom tom tom tom tom tom tom tom tom tom tom tom tom tom tom tom tom tom tom tom tom tom tom tom tom tom tom tom tom tom tom tom tom tom tom tom tom tom tom tom tom tom tom tom tom tom tom tom tom tom tom tom tom tom tom tom tom tom tom tom tom tom tom tom tom tom tom tom tom tom tom tom tom tom tom tom tom tom tom tom tom tom tom tom tom tom tom tom tom tom tom tom tom tom tom tom tom tom tom tom tom tom tom tom tom tom tom tom tom tom tom tom tom tom tom tom tom tom tom tom tom tom tom tom tom tom tom tom tom tom tom tom tom tom tom tom tom tom tom tom tom tom tom tom tom tom tom tom tom tom tom tom tom tom tom tom tom tom tom tom tom tom tom tom tom tom tom tom tom tom tom tom tom tom tom tom tom tom tom tom tom tom tom tom tom tom tom tom tom tom tom tom tom tom tom tom tom tom tom tom tom tom tom tom tom tom tom tom tom tom tom tom tom tom tom tom tom tom tom tom tom tom tom tom tom tom tom tom tom tom tom tom tom tom tom tom tom tom tom tom tom tom tom tom tom tom tom tom tom tom tom tom tom tom tom tom tom tom tom tom tom tom tom tom tom tom tom tom tom tom tom tom tom tom tom tom tom tom tom tom tom tom tom tom tom tom tom tom tom tom tom tom tom tom tom tom tom tom tom tom tom tom tom tom tom tom tom tom tom tom tom tom tom tom tom tom tom tom tom tom tom tom tom tom tom tom tom tom tom tom tom tom tom tom tom tom tom tom tom tom tom tom tom tom tom tom tom tom tom tom tom tom tom tom tom tom tom tom tom tom tom tom tom tom tom tom tom tom tom tom tom tom tom tom tom tom tom tom tom tom tom tom tom tom tom tom tom tom tom tom tom tom tom tom tom tom tom tom tom tom tom

Posted On: Thursday, Jul. 29 2010 @ 12:53PM

Write Comment


Comments may not show up immediately after submission. Please wait a minute after posting a comment for it to appear.

All reader comments are subject to our Terms of Use. By clicking "Post," you acknowledge that you have reviewed and agree to these Terms.

Sign up for free stuff, news info & more!

Tools

Links

Linkage

Newspapers: Daily

Newspapers: Other

Other Local Publications

Web Sites: Politics

Radio

Television