
Notes from Gavin Newsom’s hour long interview on KQED.
By Benjamin Wachs
Gavin Newsom sat behind the mike of KQED’s “forum” for a full hour yesterday, and came through it smelling like a rose. He was enthusiastic, collected, and in control. He handled being compared to the Taliban by one listener pretty well. He was, dare I say it? Gubernatorial.
Maybe that’s because they spent most of their time talking about Gavin’s favorite issue: Gay Marriage took up nearly half the show’s time (by my admittedly rough estimates). Apparently he's in favor of it.
Several more minutes were spent on Newsom’s own upcoming nuptials, which people are bizarrely fascinated by.
But when the topic turned to city politics there were, indeed, a few jaw dropping moments: most of which raised the question “Can he really believe that? Really?”
Excerpts from those moments are below. But first: MisterMayor, KQED host Michael Krasny, and me gotta have words.
Gentlemen: For the record, I am NOT BeyondChron.
At 18 minutes and 50 seconds into the interview, Krasny compares SF’s budget to that of other cities, saying this information was “pointed out by BeyondChron.”
Uh uh. That was SF Government InAction, here on the Snitch. Krasny used the exact cities I used, with the exact numbers … numbers that never appeared on the worthy BeyondChron.
But okay, that’s an ego thing. What’s more important is Newsom’s response:
“I’m so immeasurably disappointed in what I believe are well intentioned writers and people of conscience that are completely missing the point. We are not a city exclusively as Chicago and L.A. are. You can’t compare the 3. We are a city and a county. This is of such profound consequence. Let me explain …” He goes on to explain that counties run a bunch of things that city’s don’t like welfare programs and airports.
Krasny lets him get away with that, but not me (and possibly not BeyondChron - who knows?).