The SF Weekly News Blog



Add to Technorati Favorites

Blogroll

Newspaper Union Stirring to Life in the East Bay

Fri May 02, 2008 at 02:35:33 PM

norma_rae_union.jpg

By John Geluardi

East Bay newspaper employees who have been alarmed at the declining quality of journalism took responsibility for their own futures on Friday by asking to be formally recognized as a union.

Union organizers launched their campaign in October and after seven months of after-work meetings, thousands of e-mails and a lot of beer drinking, they were able to get a strong majority of the 250 eligible employees to sign guild cards. If the union is finalized by ballot, the organizers will have succeeded in unionizing the largest newspaper chain in the Bay Area, which includes the Contra Costa Times, the Oakland Tribune and The Argus.

Organizers Sara Steffens and Karl Fischer, both award winning Contra Costa Times reporters, went to the Oakland office of the National Labor Relations Board to petition for formal recognition as a union. The petition will trigger an official workplace ballot, which is expected to take place some time in June.

The cluster of 11 daily newspapers and various weeklies is owned by MediaNews, the fourth largest newspaper chain in the country. Last August, when MediaNews merged its East Bay newspapers into the Bay Area News Group - East Bay, the company unceremoniously stopped recognizing a 20-year-old bargaining unit at six of its newspapers.

Newspapers across the country have been plagued with falling revenue and declining readership for years. The quality of journalism has suffered due to massive layoffs, overworked editors and shrinking coverage areas. Organizers say one of the union’s goals will be working with management to produce the best possible journalism despite troubles in the industry.

“It’s heartening to see so many of us come together, during these turbulent times saying ‘We deserve a seat at the table.’ Tough decisions need to be made, but we want to be part of the building our future,” Steffens says. “I’m incredibly proud to be part of our newsrooms today.”

An editor, who asked that his name not be used, says forming a union will add tension to a bad situation. “I might have supported the idea of a union five years ago, but now it’s just not the right thing to do,” he says. “I think it will alienate employees from managers and that’s not good at a time when we need to pull together.”

Fischer says the Contra Costa Times has had a long tradition of good will between employees and management and it will be the goal of the union to enhance that. He added that both union organizers and management took great pains to stay on the high road during the seven-month campaign and they have a shared goal of creating a quality product.

“After the merger, there was a real malaise that settled on the CCT. We were losing the things that made us a distinguished, quality newspaper,” Fischer says. “My main motivation was to try and shore up work conditions to make a more hospitable place where good journalists can come, hang up their hat and stay for a long time.”

Read more about the organizing effort here.


Category: Breaking News

5 Comments:

George Avalos says:

If you want to be fair in your reporting, you should follow up another story about how there is a budding effort at the newspapers to keep our publications union free.

Employees wear buttons every day that say "union free."

***One of our biggest concerns: The union bosses at our newspaper may force us to be fired if we don't join a union we want to have nothing to do with.

***Another concern: We anticipate that the union bosses will kill our pay raises because that's the typical outcome during negotiations for a first-time contract. We will continue to receive performance reviews. some of those reviews could easily be quite positive. However, we would no longer actually receive any pay raises.

Knight Ridder and the newspaper guild killed pay raises at the Monterey Herald, and that practice continued under MediaNews. MediaNews and the Newspaper Guild killed pay raises at ANG during the first contract. And MediaNews and the Newspaper Guild killed pay raises at the York, Pa. papers. I believe those pay raises remain dead in York at this time.

And the union bosses who control the workers at the York paper continue to insist that journalists be fired if they do not formally join the union bosses.

-George Avalos - Bay Area newspaper reporter

Anonymous says:

George,
Have you investigated the San Jose contract at all? Or MediaNews contracts in Denver or St. Paul? You should check into those.

George Avalos says:

*****
George,
Have you investigated the San Jose contract at all? Or MediaNews contracts in Denver or St. Paul? You should check into those.
*****
Anon.,
those are largely irrelevant. None of those contracts are first-time contracts. The only relevance, perhaps, is I suspect some or all of them are closed shops.

If the closed shop correlation is the one you want to make, that underscores my original point: The union bosses would demand that current BANG-EB employees who do not join the union would be fired.

Armando says:

George,

It appears you are involved in the small anti-union effort, and I believe you are the one covering the union drive for the BANG papers.

If you "want to be fair in your reporting", as you encourage the author here, shouldn't you at least disclose in your CCT coverage of the union drive that you are one of the leaders of this anti-union effort?

Wouldn't that be the ethical thing to do? Or recuse yourself from covering the campaign?

George Avalos says:

Here is my latest comment in a blog underway at Eastbayexpress.com

Armando says:
George,

*****
Armando: It appears you are involved in the small anti-union effort,
*****
George: It's actually a "union-free" effort. We want the newspaper to remain union free. Why would we want our papers to suffer the same afflictions that hounded the ANG papers during their union years?

While we were a union free publication, we beat the ANG papers in scoops, awards, quality, advertising and profitability. And that was under BOTH Lesher and KRI.


*****
Armando: and I believe you are the one covering the union drive for the BANG papers.
*****
Geoge: I write about many business- and finance-related matters as you can see from my tagline.

*****
Armando: If you "want to be fair in your reporting"
*****
George: If my reporting is unfair, please specify which story was unfair and how. Set aside your own bias against me for what I personally believe, Armando, and tell me how the story is unfair and I'll make sure to remedy it.

*****
Armando: as you encourage the author here, shouldn't you at least disclose in your CCT coverage of the union drive that you are one of the leaders of this anti-union effort?
*****
George: You just made a Gammon-style straw man argument


*****
Armando: Wouldn't that be the ethical thing to do? Or recuse yourself
*****
George: Recuse? What am I, on the U.S. Supreme Court?

*****
Armando: from covering the campaign?
*****
George: Spoken like a true attorney for the union bosses -- or at the very least, an intern-in-training-to-be a union boss lawyer.


Bottom line: Neither you nor any of the union bosses can argue the merits of the objections against the union.

If you ask specific questions of the union bosses in the East Bay, or the union bosses on Natoma Street in San Francisco, or the union bosses in their fancy offices in their Washington, D.C. high rise, all you will get are vague replies. "We'll check with the members" "We'll have to see" "That would be for contract negotiations"

A question to the union bosses: Which members will you ask? How will you ask them? When will you ask them? What will you ask them?

Why don't you answer any of these questions, Armando?

Or maybe you can get one of the union bosses to answer a question?

If they don't -- or won't -- shouldn't that trouble you?

Here are more questions:

1. will the union bosses demand that our newspapers fire rank-and-file workers if they don't want to pay dues to the guild?

2. will the union bosses cancel pay raises for ordinary, hard-working journalists year after year?

3. Will the union bosses, after a decade of negotiations, simply capitulate -- like the union bosses did the first time at ANG -- and just say "Sorry. We know this contract sucks. But this was the best we could get."

-George Avalos
Bay Area News Group reporter
925-977-8477

Post a comment

(If you haven't left a comment here before, you may need to be approved by the site owner before your comment will appear. Until then, it won't appear on the entry. Thanks for waiting.)




SF Weekly Insiders

  • Local food, music and news blasts
  • Free Stuff