The SF Weekly News Blog



Add to Technorati Favorites

Blogroll

The Call for “Vagrant” Hunters: San Francisco Chronicle’s homelessness crusade raises ethical questions

Fri Oct 12, 2007 at 07:57:52 AM

When we picked up yesterday’s San Francisco Chronicle, we were hardly surprised to see yet another gigantic headline hanging over the latest C.W. Nevius column about homelessness, which dominated the front page.

We were, however, a bit taken aback by the “Help us document the problem” box that accompanied the attention-grabbing Nevius piece. “Chronicle readers often write us about scenes on the street or vagrants camping out in front of their homes,” it reads. “If you see something you think would make a good photo, shoot it and send it to cwnevius@sfchronicle.com with your name and a line describing the location attached.”

It adds, “We’ll post many of your photos on sfgate.com.”

(We contemplated sending in a photo of the heel of one of our berry-colored t-strap shoes stomping on the Chronicle, but thought that may be considered uncouth.)

Anyhow, besides finding the call for citizen “vagrant” hunters fairly creepy, we couldn’t help but wonder whether the Chron was treading into sketchy ethical territory. Are these readers asking for permission before making pictures? Are they even confirming whether those being photographed are, in fact, homeless?

“It raises questions,” Bob Steele, the Nelson Poynter Scholar for Journalism Values at The Poynter Institute, said when he learned of the Chronicle’s call for photos. “Journalistic questions, ethical questions, procedural questions.”

Steele said citizens, in most cases, aren’t unbiased observers but rather have strong feelings about homelessness. It’s easy to alter images or recordings so they falsely portray an event or issue, he added.

“There could be serious issues of fairness and accuracy if a news organization posts online or broadcasts pictures, video, sound, interviews that are sent to them by a citizen,” Steele said.

We know, Mr. Bronstein, we know. Citizen journalism is all the rage. But with an emotional issue like homelessness, hopefully it’s not too old-school to think there’s room for some credibility, too.

“News organization, even in these dramatically changing times, should remain vigilant in protecting the integrity of the content,” Steele warned.

--Mary Spicuzza

Category: Media

3 Comments:

Mimi Chakarova, a photojournalism lecturer at the UC Berkeley Graduate School of Journalism, added the following comment:

"Those of us who do this as a profession have a code of ethics that we abide. We develop relationships with people, we explain the purpose of the photographs and interviews, we also stand by our work when questioned. It's a very different concept from having people using their cell phone cameras and snapping random shots of people living on the street."

*Full disclosure: I took a photography class from Chakarova while attending UC Berkeley.

Robert says:

Oh, please... the reality is that we have a huge bum problem in San Francisco. We're not talking about layoff victims, we're not talking about battered women and single mothers. Those are more or less taken care of. What we're talking about is feral human beings, bums, vagrants, hobos. Many are mentally ill, many are substance addicted, and many are both. Many, too, are just bums, good-for-nothing losers and misfits. They defecate in the streets, they harass passers-by, they commit a range of petty crimes, and they are immune to the usual punishments of jail and fines.

That's the reality we face, and we need to do something about it, something that does not involve the misguided enabling policies of the past. I no longer feel any guilt for not shedding any tears for these bums. They destroyed their lives; I didn't. Now they're destrying our city. Why should we allow that?

We are known among international travellers for our bums. We have the nation's highest number of bums per capita. Why should that be? There's no reason. I suppose Nevius in his campaign. We need to lite a fire under our politicians, and we need to get the bums out of here.

As the previous comment illustrates, the Chronicle and Gavin Newsom are both working to raise their own popularity by giving the frustrated middle class permission to hate a powerless minority. The climate they are trying to create in San Francisco bizarrely exempts homeless people from the usual late-20th-century moral strictures against public expressions of bigotry.

Our civilized restrictions against prejudice based on gender, race, religion, sexual orientation, etc. seem to have penned up reservoirs of hate in some people. These otherwise inhibited haters are now being given permission to dump out their very worst on the most disadvantaged people.

What kind of city is it that tolerates a campaign of hatred against its poorest people for the crime of having no money?

Post a comment

(If you haven't left a comment here before, you may need to be approved by the site owner before your comment will appear. Until then, it won't appear on the entry. Thanks for waiting.)




SF Weekly Insiders

  • Local food, music and news blasts
  • Free Stuff