The Snitch




Add to Technorati Favorites

Blogroll

Chicken John Campaign's Net Worth: A Timeline

Mon Oct 29, 2007 at 01:38:22 PM

johnny.jpg
Note that estimates involve the amounts of money theoretically recognized by the city’s ethics commission.

By Benjamin Wachs

August 1 (approx): Chicken John declares his candidacy. San Francisco thinks he isn’t serious. Estimated campaign net worth: $0

August 10: Chicken John officially files as a candidate. Board of Elections clerks think he can’t be serious. Estimated campaign net worth: $10,000.

August 26: After holding a major fundraiser, Chicken John’s campaign happily announces they’re thiiiis close to qualifying for public funds. San Francisco realizes he’s serious. Estimated campaign net worth: $23,000

August 27: Chicken John’s campaign realizes their accounting software is buggy: they’re not actually so close. Progressives wonder why they ever took him seriously. Estimated campaign net worth: $15,000.

August 28: After a marathon last-ditch fundraising appeal, Chicken John’s campaign declares it has raised over $26,000 in qualifying campaign contributions, files paperwork entitling it to a big chunk of public money. Public says “goddam.” Estimated campaign net worth: $76,000

September 13: The city’s ethics commission declares that virtually all of Chicken John’s campaign funds are ineligible because the city doesn’t take Pay-Pal. Estimated campaign net worth: $5,000

September 19: Chicken John campaign resubmits paperwork after Pay-Pal executives yell at city. Estimated campaign net worth: $78,000

October 1: The Ethics Commission approves a much larger chunk of donations to Chicken John’s campaign, but stops a few hundred dollars short of the threshold for public funds. No one in the city could possibly ever think that’s suspicious. Estimated campaign net worth: $20,000

October 3: Chicken John’s lawyer submits a letter to the Ethics Commission asking which donations to the Chicken for Mayor campaign are ineligible and asks for a date to submit an appeal. Ethics Commission Executive Director John St. Croix responds that by submitting this letter asking for an appeal date, the campaign has lost its right to appeal. This is how bureaucrats say “Fuck you.” Estimated campaign net worth: $24,000

October 15: The Chicken John campaign goes before the full Ethics Commission, which unanimously overturns St. Croix’s decision and allows the Chicken John campaign to resubmit its documents with some of the previously discounted contributions declared in its favor. The campaign now says it has the money, in which case by now it’s worth an estimated $80,000. If it doesn’t have the money, it’s probably back down to $24,000.

Last Week: St. Croix categorically denies a review order by the Ethic's Commission. Back down to $24,000.

Category: Government

2 Comments:

Lil Mike says:

Interesting how ethics commissioners who've previously had no interest in timely check ups on previous funny fundraising & seriously suspicious spending stuff in past tight DA, Supervisor and ballot measure contests now are real busy checking out Mr. Rinaldi's futile campaign.

Hmmmmmmm...

Gosh, wasn't it just last election when Kamala Harris violated spending limits to crush Hallinan, and the silence in City Hall was deafening. It's strange that in a city where the big players, lobby groups, & "consultants" consistently break the campaign laws, then quietly make amends after the campaign... that a lowly lil' first timer runs afoul...

I smell a rotten egg... and is it even Chicken's?

THE SYSTEM WORKS! HOORAY!

Chicken John, who calls his campaign an "Art Project" and says he doesn't want to win, and who wasn't even serious enough to learn the rules but instead behaved according to however he thought the rules "should" be, was denied public funding. We weren't forced to pay for his "art project"! This is how it should be!

The long and short of it is, matching funds were instituted to help candidates get elected without having to bow to moneyed interests. Implicit in this is: if you are not trying to wind an election, you don't deserve matching funds! And Chicken John has repeatedly stated he doesn't want to win. So why should the taxpayers be forced to pay for his shenanigans?

We thank the ethics commission for doing their jobs scrupulously and protecting us from having to pay for this spoiled hipster's little prank.

And to those who think they have some kind iof grudge or this was some kind of conspiracy: You're crazy. You really think Chicken John is important enough that city officials would conspire to prevent him from running? What kind of drugs are you on? Outside the little bubble that is the underground art scene, he's nobody. These people were just doing their jobs.

You want to hear something suspicious, think about this: Chicken John, who has a 5,000 person mailing list and history of cons and ripping people off, suddenly decides he cares enough about artists to run for Mayor (as if you can help cultraul issues by running a self-aggrandizing campaign for mayor, rather than by starting a nonprofit foundation or, if you must run for public office, by running for supervisor) the same year a matching funds program goes into effect for candidates who can collect a great enough number of donations... even though the exodus of artists from SF peaked SEVEN YEARS AGO. Where was he then, when the problem was serious but there were no matching public funds for Mayoral candidates? Living in his Mission District warehouse, collecting money from his tenants, and NOT RUNNING FOR MAYOR. If anyone has ulterior motives in any of this, it's Chicken John.

Post a comment

(If you haven't left a comment here before, you may need to be approved by the site owner before your comment will appear. Until then, it won't appear on the entry. Thanks for waiting.)




SF Weekly Insiders

  • Local food, music and news blasts
  • Free Stuff