Could a Soda Tax Save Lives?

Categories: Talking Points
soda_can_wall .jpg
At 12 cents a can, revenue from a soda tax would add up quickly.
In April last year, the California state Assembly Committee on Revenue and Taxation shot down AB 669, Assemblymember Bill Monning's attempt to pass a penny-per-ounce tax on all sweetened beverages, such as sodas, energy drinks, and sweetened fruit-juice drinks. Monning's office estimated that the tax, which would be paid by distributors, would raise $1.7 billion every year for a children's health fund and would spur people to drink less soda.

Now researchers from UCSF and Columbia University say a one-cent-per-ounce soda tax would save lives, too. Their article, published in this month's issue of Health Affairs, uses several mathematical models to predict that a national soda tax wouldn't just raise $13 billion a year in revenue but $17 billion in savings from reductions in diabetes and obesity.


Calculating that a federal soda tax would cause people to drink 15 percent less soda and that they'd replace only 40 percent of those calories with additional food or drinks, the researchers estimated that the tax "would reduce new cases of diabetes by 2.6 percent and the prevalence of obesity by 1.5 percent. Although small, these percentage reductions would, over the course of ten years, result in 95,000 fewer instances of coronary heart disease, 8,000 fewer strokes, [and] 26,000 fewer premature deaths." And if the tax disproportionately affects the poor, all the better, the researchers say; that's the income group with the highest rates of diabetes and obesity.

Why such a big tax -- close to 20 percent on some beverages? Because other studies have shown that smaller soda taxes don't change behavior.

These figures, of course, are based on mountains of speculation. Would raising the cost of a 20-ounce bottle of soda by 20 cents really cause people to buy 15 percent less? Sodas are heavy profit-generating drinks; why wouldn't producers just suck up some of the cost of the tax, encouraging people to keep buying? And would former soda drinkers only compensate for 40 percent of the calories they've just saved with other drinks and snacks? 

The biggest question: In the current political climate, could a steep soda tax even be passed? Eleven states so far have tried, and failed. But over the past few decades, tobacco taxes have helped curb lung cancer rates. There's reason to believe that, if Americans finally decide soda is a societal ill, taxing soda producers could reduce some of its most egregious health effects. 

Follow us on Twitter: @sfoodieand like us on Facebook.
Follow me at @JonKauffman.

Like this Story?

Sign up for the Dining Newsletter: The week's top local food news and events, plus interviews with chefs and restaurant owners, dining tips, and a peek at our print review.

Privacy Policy
Sign up for free stuff, news info & more!

Tools

Browse Voice Nation
  • Voice Places

    Voice Places

    Discover restaurants, nightlife, travel, shopping...

  • VOICE Daily Deals

    VOICE Daily Deals

    Get 50 to 90% off every day on restaurants, movies, massages...

  • Best Of

    Best Of...

    More than 10,000 of the BEST things to eat, drink, and experience

  • My Voice Nation

    My Voice Nation

    Join the Village Voice community and get exclusive deals and info

  • Happy Hour

    Happy Hour

    Your local Happy Hour guide at your fingertips

or

Log in or Sign up

Social Connect:

Use your favorite account to access My Voice Nation.


Use your My Voice Nation account to log in:





Forgot password?
or

Sign Up or Log in

Social Connect:

Sign up for My Voice Nation with your preferred network.


Sign up for a My Voice Nation account:



Privacy policy