Could a Soda Tax Save Lives?

Categories: Talking Points
soda_can_wall .jpg
At 12 cents a can, revenue from a soda tax would add up quickly.
In April last year, the California state Assembly Committee on Revenue and Taxation shot down AB 669, Assemblymember Bill Monning's attempt to pass a penny-per-ounce tax on all sweetened beverages, such as sodas, energy drinks, and sweetened fruit-juice drinks. Monning's office estimated that the tax, which would be paid by distributors, would raise $1.7 billion every year for a children's health fund and would spur people to drink less soda.

Now researchers from UCSF and Columbia University say a one-cent-per-ounce soda tax would save lives, too. Their article, published in this month's issue of Health Affairs, uses several mathematical models to predict that a national soda tax wouldn't just raise $13 billion a year in revenue but $17 billion in savings from reductions in diabetes and obesity.


Calculating that a federal soda tax would cause people to drink 15 percent less soda and that they'd replace only 40 percent of those calories with additional food or drinks, the researchers estimated that the tax "would reduce new cases of diabetes by 2.6 percent and the prevalence of obesity by 1.5 percent. Although small, these percentage reductions would, over the course of ten years, result in 95,000 fewer instances of coronary heart disease, 8,000 fewer strokes, [and] 26,000 fewer premature deaths." And if the tax disproportionately affects the poor, all the better, the researchers say; that's the income group with the highest rates of diabetes and obesity.

Why such a big tax -- close to 20 percent on some beverages? Because other studies have shown that smaller soda taxes don't change behavior.

These figures, of course, are based on mountains of speculation. Would raising the cost of a 20-ounce bottle of soda by 20 cents really cause people to buy 15 percent less? Sodas are heavy profit-generating drinks; why wouldn't producers just suck up some of the cost of the tax, encouraging people to keep buying? And would former soda drinkers only compensate for 40 percent of the calories they've just saved with other drinks and snacks? 

The biggest question: In the current political climate, could a steep soda tax even be passed? Eleven states so far have tried, and failed. But over the past few decades, tobacco taxes have helped curb lung cancer rates. There's reason to believe that, if Americans finally decide soda is a societal ill, taxing soda producers could reduce some of its most egregious health effects. 

Follow us on Twitter: @sfoodieand like us on Facebook.
Follow me at @JonKauffman.
My Voice Nation Help
4 comments
Sort: Newest | Oldest
Mrchild
Mrchild

 wow ~~  A nice place ---- T' a'' ll h' u 'b. С'⊙'M '--- it's the most effective site in the world to connect with, date

and marry tall  people.. It's worthy a try.4354657

Briansays
Briansays

tax tax taxthen hire more government employees or vendors/ngo types to "educate" you with the gravy/grant train

Paulin Soleyman
Paulin Soleyman

While food prices in general have risen in the past two decades, the price of sodas (and pizza and hamburgers) have declined or remained stable. Could there be a correlation between food pricing trends and rising obesity rates in America? Makes you wonder ...

I reviewed a similar study last year that came to the same conclusion as this UCSF/Columbia model on soda taxes. Read more about it at http://www.theundergroundbootc...

Now Trending

From the Vault

 

©2014 SF Weekly, LP, All rights reserved.
Loading...