Why Are All You Guys Reviewing the Same Place at Once?
![]() |
| Kimberly Sandie |
| Did all you critics need to gush over Nojo's tempura this week? |
Why did you, Michael Bauer, and Patricia Unterman review Nojo in the same week? Did you all go to the restaurant together?In the days when I read restaurant reviews rather than writing them, weeks like this used to infuriate me. Now that I'm part of the problem, it just makes me sigh. In fact, I suspected Nojo might have a three-review week.
High-profile restaurants are likely to get reviewed as soon as they become eligible -- for most regular restaurant critics in town, open season begins 30 days after opening day. Most of us go several times to the restaurant, spread out over two to four weeks. It takes another two weeks to file the story, follow it through the editing process, and have the photographer visit. Minimum wait time for a review to appear after a restaurant opens: six weeks. (Nojo opened March 30, so it earned itself a couple of extra weeks.)
In fact, if you're of a mathematical bent, you might be able to calculate the probability of a triple-review week yourself.
![]() |
| It's kind of like this. |
Why do I observe the 30-day schedule? Don't I wish I could give restaurants six months to get settled before writing about them? I do. But I also want to file a review of a new place when people are asking me about it, and sometimes, I admit, I'd rather not be the last newspaper critic to speak up about a spot. (Other times, I don't care -- after all, Yelpers have been weighing in since the friends and family dinners.)
For the record, I still haven't seen any critics I recognize while I'm out at work. Though, given the size of this city, I can predict it will happen ... soon.






























